Re: [Bitpim-devel] Any Windows registry API experts?

[Jim <Ji...@ja...>]

Ok, will have to look at codebase when I get home.

Just sent you a code example which works here (at work).

If you get a chance, would you send me an export of your USB registry tree for
me to test against?

My lunch break is over now...must get back to "work". :)

Jim West
www.jameswest.com

The box said Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux.


---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Roger Binns" <ro...@ro...>
To: <bit...@li...>
Sent: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:26:03 -0800
Subject: Re: [Bitpim-devel] Any Windows registry API experts?

> >   Do you need something "generic" or will something specific with regards to
> > this key tree be acceptable?
> 
> The code already exists.  Look for the 'safegetchildren' method in comscan.py.
> The problem is that for the last 4 out of 22 child entries of a particular
> key on my machine, it returns 234 - More data available.
> 
> The current code uses _winreg.  I also tried using the win32api from 
> win32all and got the same result.
> 
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/sysinfo/base/regenumkey.asp
> 
> That shows the only way ERROR_MORE_DATA can be returned is if the buffer
> supplied is too small.  However the keys it is falling over on are
> tiny in length so something else is actually happening.  It affecting
> both win32api and _winreg is wierd.
> 
> Roger
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
> Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Bitpim-devel mailing list
> Bit...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel
------- End of Original Message -------