From: Andreas A. <a.a...@th...> - 2001-10-01 09:59:45
|
Hi Andris, >I'm listening.... Sometimes, as it is not very easy to >get to the Internet nowadays. (:<) Hmm. I think I know what you mean. I waited 1 year for my adsl port 'caus they promised to have the infrastructure but they did not. But now: warpspeed, mr. sulu. ;-) >I you still need this [after discussion of SML, etc], I'm >going to think about it. I'd defenetly say "yes" - but not immediatly (even if it would be fine). I think it's good to have this supported. Especially for very short bc:tags like <bc:img id="123" /> where just the id is required. Andi >Andris > >> Hi Andris, >> >> did you or can you modify the XMLUtils to support attributes? I >thought of >> the following: >> >> <tag id="moo" name="HelloWorld" package="hello_world"> >> <child var="value" var2="value2" /> >> </tag> >> >> array( >> 'id' => "moo", >> 'name' => HelloWorld", >> 'package' => "hello_world", >> 'child' => array( >> 'var' => "value", >> 'var2' => "value2", >> ), >> ); >> >> >> This would save lotta work with the Bcc*Compiler classes. > |