From: alex b. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-27 17:12:09
|
Have a look at the bottom of that sample entity definition: if there is not a 1:1 field correspondence, you need to define a field map. that's shown at the bottom in entity:schema. _a ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerry Kirk" <ge...@mc...> To: <bin...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:51 PM Subject: Re: [binarycloud-dev] EntityManager Roadmap > > We will be able to generate metabase schema definitions from entity > > definitions, but I don't (can't) force a 1:1 correspondence with entity > > field names and table column names. > > > > The short answer is that if you build something relatively simple with > > binarycloud you will almost certainly have a 1:1 field correspondence, > > but if you're building something more complex you'll need more entities > > to provide you with 'views' of your data. > > > So _how_ does binarycloud figure out the mapping from entity to tables and > fields? > > Sorry if I'm not getting something rather obvious. > Gerry > > > _alex > > > > > -- > IT Specialist | "Do not repay anyone evil for evil. If your enemy > MCC | is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him > Bangladesh | a drink. Do not be overcome by evil, > | but overcome evil with good." - Bible > > > ----------------------------------------- > This email was sent using SquirrelMail. > "Webmail for nuts!" > http://squirrelmail.org/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > binarycloud-dev mailing list > bin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev > |