Re: [binarycloud-dev] revised entity def format...

[Alex B. <en...@tu...>]

>> Wouldn't this be better accomplished with a user-definable field-type with an
>> associated I/O class..having a tag called "encrypt" seems too simplistic to
>> really provide any meaningful encryption service..
> 
> For example: we'll have systeic

heh, that is not a word. somehow "systemic" became "systeic"

_a