From: John D. <jo...@we...> - 2001-09-25 22:40:20
|
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Alex Black wrote: > added .. <encrypt> to field defs. > Wouldn't this be better accomplished with a user-definable field-type with an associated I/O class..having a tag called "encrypt" seems too simplistic to really provide any meaningful encryption service.. -- John Donagher Application Engineer, Intacct Corp. Public key available off http://www.keyserver.net Key fingerprint = 4024 DF50 56EE 19A3 258A D628 22DE AD56 EEBE 8DDD |