Re: [binarycloud-dev] BCTagParser.php

[Alex B. <en...@tu...>]

not at all,
and that's precisely what I'm pointing to...

in theory I like the idea of forcing xhtml, in practice I don't want to do
it because of the production implications.

I think we're better off allowing users to do what they please.

_a

> I agree, in that it makes sense to stick with XML/XHTML formatting for
> everything.  The advantages here are obvious.  If this is the chosen
> path, I would not have a problem with this either.
> 
> Though, as I think most people would agree, it should be up to the user.
> 
> If ALL HTML was generated by BinaryCloud through some tag conversion,
> I'd be more inclined to say that the user should have a choice of
> HTML3.2, HTML4.1, or XHTML1.0, but this isn't what the tag parser really
> does.
> 
> If a master template uses loose HTML3.2, and the BCP output is strict
> XHTML, the resulting page would still not meet XHTML qualification.
> Because it is up to the user how he writes his HTML templates, it should
> also be up to the user how he writes his BCP pages.
> 
> I hope I'm not missing the overall picture with my point.
> jason
> 
> 
> 
> "Andreas Aderhold (Thyrell)" wrote:
>> I think if we start using xml stuff (we already have in the configs) we
>> should use it throughout the system. Ok, it would force xhtml on users - but
>> bc is targeting professional users and big projects. So using xhmtl would
>> not be a drawback in my mind.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> binarycloud-dev mailing list
> bin...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev
>