Re: [binarycloud-dev] BCTagParser.php

[Jason H. <jc...@ey...>]

I agree, in that it makes sense to stick with XML/XHTML formatting for
everything.  The advantages here are obvious.  If this is the chosen
path, I would not have a problem with this either.

Though, as I think most people would agree, it should be up to the user.

If ALL HTML was generated by BinaryCloud through some tag conversion,
I'd be more inclined to say that the user should have a choice of
HTML3.2, HTML4.1, or XHTML1.0, but this isn't what the tag parser really
does.

If a master template uses loose HTML3.2, and the BCP output is strict
XHTML, the resulting page would still not meet XHTML qualification. 
Because it is up to the user how he writes his HTML templates, it should
also be up to the user how he writes his BCP pages.

I hope I'm not missing the overall picture with my point. 
jason



"Andreas Aderhold (Thyrell)" wrote:
> I think if we start using xml stuff (we already have in the configs) we
> should use it throughout the system. Ok, it would force xhtml on users - but
> bc is targeting professional users and big projects. So using xhmtl would
> not be a drawback in my mind.