From: Alex B. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-10 19:09:23
|
> AIEEEHH.. I though we were steering clear of HTML abstraction. If the No. That's what formbuilder and listbuilder effectively do: abstract html so you can just say "give me a furbees form" instead of writing a bunch of html for every form. > reason to have such a Manager is to ensure all images are properly > tagged, it would make sense to abstract all/most HTML to ensure we meet > XHTML compliance. I disagree, though you're welcome to do that with libs, etc. I have found that in large projects, a central ability to manage images and their properties is useful... thus the bc:image tag thing. Actually there wouldn't be a module or an ImageRequestManager, it would be a function of the make system, like LangKeyer. > This is so far down the line, but still an interesting thought. > jason _a |