From: Alex B. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-10 17:14:21
|
> I'll propose a potential concern here. i'm not sure how HTTPS/SSL is > handled (site level vs. page level), but if the secure hostname/path > differs from the non-secure hostname/path, make may need to know this at > build time. The hostname couldn't be different (it's not the "virtual name" hostname is single and unchangeaable...) but paths could definitely change, and that is a good point. > For example: > if only the checkout portion of a site is SSL enabled, and it's moved to > a seperate docroot to keep visitors from viewing the rest of the site > encrypted, one may want just the checkout.php to sit elsewhere > > > http://mysite.com -> /var/www/html/mysite.com/ > which has shop.php (categories.php, specials.php, etc etc) > https://mysite.com -> /var/www/html/secure/mysite.com/ > which only has checkout.php > > This may be a bit too oddball for BC to support. _shrug_ But now that I think about it, what prevents you from having this tree?: user/site_name/htdocs/ secure/ base/ doing a make 'like normal' and just setting your virtualhosts accordingly? ... I'm trying to think of holes in that theory :) _a |