[binarycloud-dev] Fw: [PEAR-DEV] Re: BinaryCloud should be let into PEAR withothers as well.... my 2cents

[alex b. <en...@tu...>]

this is cool.

so, I think I will again wait to see, but this is an extremely good sign. :)

_a

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stig S. Bakken" <Sti...@fa...>
To: "Alex Black" <en...@tu...>
Cc: <pea...@li...>
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 4:00 AM
Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: BinaryCloud should be let into PEAR withothers
as well.... my 2cents


> Alex Black wrote:
> >
> > >> Inclusion should not necessarily mean "endorsement" it should mean
"base set
> > >> of quality requirements met"
> > >>
> > >
> > > Ahh.. But I get the feeling it does.
> >
> > Right. I think that's a mistake but that's me and this isn't the place
for
> > that. Did that once (the whole proving my point thing) and I only needed
to
> > do that once :)
>
> I'm aware of this, and I too probably have a few spots on my record for
> doing this kind of thing, but I strive not to.  It will be less
> difficult when we have the distribution framework up (I want my hand
> back dammit), then distributing a PEAR class will no longer be
> equivalent with "hosted at php.net and pear-dev will rip you to shreds
> if you misindent one function" :)
>
>  - Stig
>