Re: [binarycloud-dev] Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: BinaryCloud should be let into PEAR with others as well.... my 2cents

[Alex B. <en...@tu...>]

> You did, it ain't.  Someone wanted to port a few of the "HTML-Wizard
> Classes" to PEAR (like OOH-Forms, SQL_Query, etc..) but it still hasn't
> happened, the SourceForge site set up to do this hasn't been touched in
> since the intial import several months ago.

heh

>> I haven't see anyony on the list say "no, don't add it" so I'm not sure what
>> this is in reply to (did I miss something?)
> 
> Yes, people did.

yep, and I read 'em.
 
>> 
>>> However, make room for application frameworks for binary cloud and the like,
>>> and keep those separate somehow from the core of PEAR, but at least allow
>>> them in somwhow, and now you have something that many, I mean MANY people
>>> would be very interested in.
>> 
>> That I agree with.
>> 
> 
> As do I, but it won't happen.  Get over it.  Neither phplib nor
> binarycloud will make it into PEAR.  Just move along and pretend this
> never happened.  At least, that's what I'm doing.

I don't particularly much care, to be honest. I did this because I was
interested in seeing the reaction, not because I'm dying to have binarycloud
in pear.

I do use the pear libs in bc, and I do find them useful, and I do think that
there is room for frameworks in the pear model. But I'm not interested in
raising a kerfluffle over it. I did that once, I think it was necessary
then, but I have no interest in doing it again.

>> Inclusion should not necessarily mean "endorsement" it should mean "base set
>> of quality requirements met"
> 
> Ahh.. But I get the feeling it does.

yes, that ivory tower thing, :) ... it will bit them in the ass one day 8)

anyway, I'm sad to see that phplib wasn't integrated, there are some great
tools that I think pear could benefit from. natch!

have a good one,

_alex


--
alex black, ceo
en...@tu...

the turing studio, inc.
http://www.turingstudio.com

vox+510.666.0074
fax+510.666.0093