Re: [binarycloud-dev] checkin to pear

[Alex B. <en...@tu...>]

That's a good point :)


> I was just thinking today that the Request class is a prime candidate
> for inclusion with PEAR.
> 
> Also spent much of the day getting up to speed with Metabase :)

Yep, I like :)


> -dave
> 
>> For those of you interested why I decided to do this, for a couple reasons:
>> 
>>     -I am very much interested to see their reaction
>>     -We adhere to the coding standards, so "why not?"
>>     -We may end up merging some of the classes, but if we'' only do that if
>> we get the features we need - so I'm happy to do that. (I.e. we had
>> discussed adding some things to PEAR_Error, instead of writing a binarycloud
>> error class from scratch.)
>>     -Those doing pear are competent, experienced coders, and it can never
>> hurt to have 'em looking at the code.
>> 
>> It's sort of a whim, very much a political experiment. We'll see what we
>> see, eh :)
>> 
>> _a


--
alex black, ceo
en...@tu...

the turing studio, inc.
http://www.turingstudio.com

vox+510.666.0074
fax+510.666.0093