Re: [binarycloud-dev] checkin to pear

[David W. <dwe...@po...>]

I was just thinking today that the Request class is a prime candidate 
for inclusion with PEAR.

Also spent much of the day getting up to speed with Metabase :)

-dave

>For those of you interested why I decided to do this, for a couple reasons:
>
>     -I am very much interested to see their reaction
>     -We adhere to the coding standards, so "why not?"
>     -We may end up merging some of the classes, but if we'' only do that if
>we get the features we need - so I'm happy to do that. (I.e. we had
>discussed adding some things to PEAR_Error, instead of writing a binarycloud
>error class from scratch.)
>     -Those doing pear are competent, experienced coders, and it can never
>hurt to have 'em looking at the code.
>
>It's sort of a whim, very much a political experiment. We'll see what we
>see, eh :)
>
>_a

-- 
David Weingart
dwe...@po...
The foot can split wood, but it can't split a watermelon.