Re: [binarycloud-dev] capwiz

[m b <bab...@ya...>]

I have to agree with alex on this.
I've been working with 2 different systems.
One, running NAS(netscape application server) 4.0,
with all the servlets/EJB/JSP architecture
mumbo-jumbo.
And the other, running PHP4.

It turns out that the NAS, having only served
20-customer have a CPU utilization of nearly 80%
while the system running PHP4, only utilize about 25%
of the CPU.
And FYI, the NAS is hosted on a E10K server with a
spec beyond this realm of existence, while the PHP
system is hosted on a humble DELL Pentium III PC with
only 256Mb Ram with a single CPU.

Both system run more or less the same application.
It turns out that for the NAS system, we have to incur
additional cost to hire the so-called "NAS specialist"
to identify the bottleneck and "optimize" further the
system...puhhlleaassee...still they only managed to 

I can do way much better using PHP. The only good
thing about using NAS is that you can have somebody
else to blame for the crappy performance.

--- Alex Black <en...@tu...> wrote:
> > As far as I understand, jsp/servlet architecture
> is a lot faster than
> > perl/php/asp etc. Once the server engine
> interprets/compiles the script the
> 
> Reverse that, a lot _slower_. :)
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/