From: Alex B. <en...@tu...> - 2001-07-10 17:46:14
|
This was the directory structure I had in mind.. I like that better than: binarycloud/ base/ user/ sitename/ sitename/ sitename/ sitename/ etc. > Odysseas / alex, > > Perhaps to make BC multi site friendly we can do it like this: > > /path/to/binarycloud/user/siteA > /path/to/binarycloud/user/siteB > /path/to/binarycloud/user/siteC > > Move everything under > /path/to/binarycloud/user > Into > /path/to/binarycloud/user/siteA > > Then on the make command it would be: > > make siteA > > Or to build a site skeleton: > make new name=siteA > > Perhaps the skeleton should be placed under: > /path/to/binarycloud/base/skeleton That's an interesting idea, but user/ would effectively provide that in the distro tarballs. That's why those tarballs are like that: so you can install a functioning, if small application. _a > > Regards, > Jimmy Harlindong > > > > _______________________________________________ > binarycloud-dev mailing list > bin...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev > -- alex black, ceo en...@tu... the turing studio, inc. http://www.turingstudio.com vox+510.666.0074 fax+510.666.0093 |