|
From: Alex B. <en...@tu...> - 2001-07-10 17:46:14
|
This was the directory structure I had in mind..
I like that better than:
binarycloud/
base/
user/
sitename/
sitename/
sitename/
sitename/
etc.
> Odysseas / alex,
>
> Perhaps to make BC multi site friendly we can do it like this:
>
> /path/to/binarycloud/user/siteA
> /path/to/binarycloud/user/siteB
> /path/to/binarycloud/user/siteC
>
> Move everything under
> /path/to/binarycloud/user
> Into
> /path/to/binarycloud/user/siteA
>
> Then on the make command it would be:
>
> make siteA
>
> Or to build a site skeleton:
> make new name=siteA
>
> Perhaps the skeleton should be placed under:
> /path/to/binarycloud/base/skeleton
That's an interesting idea, but user/ would effectively provide that in the
distro tarballs. That's why those tarballs are like that: so you can install
a functioning, if small application.
_a
>
> Regards,
> Jimmy Harlindong
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> binarycloud-dev mailing list
> bin...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev
>
--
alex black, ceo
en...@tu...
the turing studio, inc.
http://www.turingstudio.com
vox+510.666.0074
fax+510.666.0093
|