Re: [binarycloud-dev] Varnames / Zend 2.0

[alex b. <en...@tu...>]

> Hmm, for the moment I don't see a reason. But with ZendEngine 2.0 it may
be
> supportet but then they would be specially marked i guess (private
> $varname).

well, looks like private vars will be supported, so a naming standard is
relevant.

> So a special naming convention isn't really neccessary.
> But there should be an convention that classvars should only be accessed
by
> getVarname(), setVarname() methods. So this implies all that all varnames
> without an accessor are private ones.

Hmm, I don't know if I agree with that.
What does it get you? i.e. why not, $ClassName->var ?
is there a reason to create a method name to match each public class var?

> - multiple Inheritances*
> - private member vars*
> - static member vars
> - exception handling (throw, try, catch)

no shit?

> - destructors
> - new objects model (similar to java, variables contina object handles
> instead of the objects)
> - improved OO Apis (java objects, com)
> - internationalization (multilingual error messages, unicode, non western
> charsets)

Yes, this last one is a good step. Everything is pretty ISO-8859-1 heavy, it
will be good to get some more mature charset support.

in any case, doesn't look like varnames are a big controversy :)

_a