Re: [binarycloud-dev] FW: GroupIT Engine

[alex b. <en...@tu...>]

> Jason says that BC is (potentially) better for speeding up
> development, code reuse, administration, Lego-izing the
> world -- than GroupIT.  Maybe the way to describe this is
> that GroupIT _may_ allow a secretary construct a slick
> site, but it leaves everything a mess underneath.

Correct, though what I am potentially interested in pulling is
caching/php2html makes. A lot of the other stuff is probably not good, but
we won't use that :)

> Like I said, I have not looked personally at GroupIT.
> From what I did see, and Jason's perusal, the vision
> and concept of BC is far more attractive than GroupIT
> for those people that want to be able to construct
> _many_ sites reliably and quickly and have what is left
> underneath reusable and easy to administrate.

And, also, groupIT is an application, where binarycloud is a platform - but
it is nonetheless interesting as an application to pull pieces from.

_alex