Re: [binarycloud-dev] LGPL

[Alex B. <en...@tu...>]

> Another option is (L)GPL'ing the development/bleeding-edge version, and having
> a BSD-licensed version lag behind. MySQL does (or at least used to do)
> something like this, although with completely opposite goals. This encourages
> contribution more than a defacto dual license, especially as long as
> binarycloud's feature list is rapidly growing.

I can't see that working, i.e. people aren't interested in r1 if r2 is out
and working :)

I would prefer to settle on one, clean license that encourages and enforces
contribution in the event of redistribution, and (yes) makes credit
mandatory.

_a


--
alex black, ceo
en...@tu...

the turing studio, inc.
http://www.turingstudio.com

vox+510.666.0074
fax+510.666.0093