From: alex b. <en...@tu...> - 2001-05-27 18:44:58
|
we may use PEAR_Cache, though we will need to either wrap it, or extend it. It doesn't have any of the "directory maintenance" stuff we need. After Lang and Auth/Perm are up, I'm going to examine PEAR_Cache once n' for all, and see if we can use it. _a ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nico Galoppo" <sc...@ac...> To: <bin...@li...> Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 1:21 AM Subject: [binarycloud-dev] Cache [was: Re: Lang ] > --* Alex Black (Sat, May 26, 2001 at 05:26:09PM -0700) *-- > > > well, there's also the caching component to build, but (hopefully) that will > > be fairly easy as there is a fair amount of code out there. > > could you run by me again why PEAR::Cache isn't good enough? I think you > said something about garbage collecting. what exactly is that, and are > you sure it isn't in PEAR::Cache already? > > --nico > > -- > nico galoppo - tremelo/leuven, belgium > - erasmus/socrates student in grenoble, france > - 4, rue béranger -- phone: +33-(0)76-85 23 19 > --------------------------------------------------------------- > [bash]:~$ man woman nico at crossbar dot net > No manual entry for woman debian linux :: vim powered > > > _______________________________________________ > binarycloud-dev mailing list > bin...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev > |