From: alex b. <en...@tu...> - 2001-05-21 06:37:42
|
> why's that? think about having documents that you want a group of users > to be able to edit/lock/view etc? i can understand user 'levels' can > partly solve this problem, but what about user joe in group foo and > group bar and user claire in group bar and group stuff. no, not "we don't need that at all" we have that. it's burrly. it works :) > a document available to group bar would be for both of them, the one in > group stuff would only be for claire. with levels, claire and joe can't > have both common *and* exclusive documents, unless you link the userid > to the document itself. right, this is all doable within the current system. > or did i get lost somewhere underway? no. > indeed. for example, using a common user 'id' base would make it all > pretty easy (for example grouping bc users & authentication into a > midgard user tree) I think I need to install midguard :) _alex |