Re: [binarycloud-dev] binarycloud vs. other web app frameworks

[Nico G. <sc...@ac...>]

--* Alex Black (Sun, May 20, 2001 at 05:58:31PM -0700) *--

> user groups
>     --> don't need

why's that? think about having documents that you want a group of users
to be able to edit/lock/view etc? i can understand user 'levels' can
partly solve this problem, but what about user joe in group foo and
group bar and user claire in group bar and group stuff.=20

a document available to group bar would be for both of them, the one in
group stuff would only be for claire. with levels, claire and joe can't
have both common *and* exclusive documents, unless you link the userid
to the document itself.

or did i get lost somewhere underway?

> > Looking at the API, i think implementing this as a bc module wouldn't=
 be
> > as hard as it may seem. Although alot of the functionality in both
> > systems will overlap ofcourse...
>=20
> I would need to look at the code, but this sounds cool.
>=20
> If it ends up being a pain to try and track stuff down, we can use some=
 of
> their "methods" that we like :)

indeed. for example, using a common user 'id' base would make it all
pretty easy (for example grouping bc users & authentication into a
midgard user tree)

--nicolas

--
nico galoppo   -   tremelo/leuven, belgium
               -   erasmus/socrates student in grenoble, france
               -   4, rue b=E9ranger -- phone: +33-(0)76-85 23 19
---------------------------------------------------------------
[bash]:~$ man woman                 nico at crossbar dot net
No manual entry for woman           debian linux :: vim powered