Re: [binarycloud-dev] binarycloud vs. other web app frameworks

[Alex B. <en...@tu...>]

> Just took an rather extensive look at their tour and docs. It seems to
> be pretty mature stuff, and I see some very interesting and complex cms
> features in there (user groups, locking, domains, approval, database
> replication).

user groups
    --> don't need
locking
    --> this is nice
domains
    --> this is nice
approval
    --> this is nice
database replication
    --> this is nice, but if we were to do it, I'd want to do it through
metabase.

I'd have to read more about what they do with this, but it occurs to me as
something that you would want to be a function of your database install, not
your app code.

> Looking at the API, i think implementing this as a bc module wouldn't be
> as hard as it may seem. Although alot of the functionality in both
> systems will overlap ofcourse...

I would need to look at the code, but this sounds cool.

If it ends up being a pain to try and track stuff down, we can use some of
their "methods" that we like :)

_alex



--
alex black, ceo
en...@tu...

the turing studio, inc.
http://www.turingstudio.com

vox+510.666.0074
fax+510.666.0093