Re: [binarycloud-dev] binarycloud vs. other web app frameworks

[alex b. <en...@tu...>]

> if i am understanding this right, i think this is beautiful.  it is
> strangely familiar concept i've played with, but nothing has ever taken
> off in code.  alex, i wish you all the best and look forward to r2.  you
> seem to have a great scheme of things in mind very well.  i hope to help
> out when the time comes..

there's much to do.

I'm trying to get a releasable r2 core available as soon as possible, the
manager and builder classes will follow soon after.

r2 will be capable of handling new core components and "plugins" white
elegantly, so we can build some fairly groovy things (caching not least
among them)

toil, toil, boil and bubble!

:)

_alex




>
> Nico Galoppo wrote:
> > > also, with the stuff we're doing, it will almost be easier to re-build
a
> > > simple app than to port it in. the new formbuilder will only spit xml
out,
> > > so we'll run that through a global xsl - that means you can write one
xsl
> > > for 90% of the forms on your site. one document.
> > >
> > > for example, a forum:
> > >     -define an entity: post
> > >     -another: thread
> > >     -another entity: forum
>
> > now, this i don't get. maybe i should take a look at your 'complex
> > example' post. should i take the 'r2 path release' and untar the
> > 'complex example' in that tree??
>
> _______________________________________________
> binarycloud-dev mailing list
> bin...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev
>