[binarycloud-dev] binarycloud vs. other web app frameworks

[Nico G. <sc...@ac...>]

hi,

i've been following the mailinglist threads for a few months now, and i
must say it has gone up exponentially :) there's quite some action
on the road ahead, with the rc2 api taking form... hopefully the code
will start coming soon...=20

in the meantime, i was wondering how you guys would compare binarycloud
to other webapp frameworks such as horde, zope; cms systems a la
phpgroupware and groupit or even weblogs like phpnuke...

i will start coding a web community site soon (for a youth movement),
with a lot of dynamic content such as photographs, bio's, shortstories,
communication between members..=20

another thing i will want to do is delegate the content, so i will need
some sort of cms system behind it, atleast for some area's of the site,
depending on the member and her/his role in the movement.

i think binarycloud (especially r2) looks very promising indeed, but
don't you think the modules all by hand using the bc framework (or horde
for that matter) will take alot more time and effort than starting out
from a readymade cms system such as groupit?

thanks for your thoughts...

--nicolas

--
nico galoppo   -   tremelo/leuven, belgium
               -   erasmus/socrates student in grenoble, france
               -   4, rue b=E9ranger -- phone: +33-(0)76-85 23 19
---------------------------------------------------------------
[bash]:~$ man woman                 nico at crossbar dot net
No manual entry for woman           debian linux :: vim powered