Re: [binarycloud-general] BC XML definitons format (XML vs. SML)

[Jason H. <jc...@ey...>]

I would certainly use SML style then.  Adding support for attributes to
XMLUtils can be done later.



Andreas Aderhold wrote:
> >Well, ideally, a perfect system would support both.
> Heh :)
> 
> >I've personally always preferred the attributes style
> >simply because it means less typing, and it's easier to read.
> 
> Both would be perfect, of course. I need to think about how the translation
> to php will be. If we use the sml style we can use XMLUtils out of the box
> to compile the bc:* tags.
oud-general