Re: [binarycloud-general] BC XML definitons format (XML vs. SML)

[Jason H. <jc...@ey...>]

Well, ideally, a perfect system would support both.  I've personally
always preferred the attributes style simply because it means less
typing, and it's easier to read.

jason


Andreas Aderhold wrote:
> I just realized that we're using simplified XML (SML) throughout the system
> (except for the bc:module, bc:href, etc. tags). What do you think of keeping
> it simple also with the bc:*-tags?
> 
> ...
> 
> I'm kinda unsure. I like both and both is descriptive as well as
> standardized ;-) But, in the bcp we use the "simple" format and maybe we
> should keep this convetion throughout.
> 
> What are you're thoughts on this?