From: Andreas A. <a.a...@th...> - 2001-08-15 22:25:50
|
Hi Alex, > Here's the trick: that syntax is available from _anywhere_. You can put it > in masters, layouts, module templates, includes, whatever! :) Cooooooooooooooooool. :-D > > above. I think this breaks xml conformance. But as I said, nice to have. > > Especially for small "just-presentation" pages. > In this case I'm not so concerned with xml conformance, if you were big on > that you could make sure your page defs used xhtml, and validated > as xml... > that would be fine. And for the ones who want to be strict they can use the "non-static-pages"-bcp syntax. I like that bc has this flexiblity. Be strict, be lax, be bc ;-) > long as a month before the first revs are in the system. I've > been focusing on other things for my business recently, > so I don't have the > kind of time Iwould like to devote to r2. But it will all happen... Ok, Fine :-) Andi |