You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(57) |
May
(287) |
Jun
(166) |
Jul
(286) |
Aug
(273) |
Sep
(254) |
Oct
(144) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: alex b. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-27 17:17:14
|
> > Erm... http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.image.php ? > Or do you want something different? Yes, a class which properly abstracts all that. _a |
From: alex b. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-27 17:12:09
|
Have a look at the bottom of that sample entity definition: if there is not a 1:1 field correspondence, you need to define a field map. that's shown at the bottom in entity:schema. _a ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerry Kirk" <ge...@mc...> To: <bin...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:51 PM Subject: Re: [binarycloud-dev] EntityManager Roadmap > > We will be able to generate metabase schema definitions from entity > > definitions, but I don't (can't) force a 1:1 correspondence with entity > > field names and table column names. > > > > The short answer is that if you build something relatively simple with > > binarycloud you will almost certainly have a 1:1 field correspondence, > > but if you're building something more complex you'll need more entities > > to provide you with 'views' of your data. > > > So _how_ does binarycloud figure out the mapping from entity to tables and > fields? > > Sorry if I'm not getting something rather obvious. > Gerry > > > _alex > > > > > -- > IT Specialist | "Do not repay anyone evil for evil. If your enemy > MCC | is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him > Bangladesh | a drink. Do not be overcome by evil, > | but overcome evil with good." - Bible > > > ----------------------------------------- > This email was sent using SquirrelMail. > "Webmail for nuts!" > http://squirrelmail.org/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > binarycloud-dev mailing list > bin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev > |
From: Charlie K. <Ch...@Ti...> - 2001-09-27 16:19:37
|
Yep. Those are the functions I'm using to create the image generator class. Charlie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Konstantin Chuguev" <Kon...@da...> To: <bin...@li...> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 1:55 AM Subject: Re: [binarycloud-dev] jpeg generator > Charlie Killian wrote: > > > I might be creating a JPEG generator in php and was wonder if it would be of > > use to BinaryCloud. The generator would take text and overlay it onto an > > existing jpeg or create a new one. This would allow for pretty printing of > > data. You can use a high quality logo and different fonts. You can do this > > with the PDF library, of course, but the commercial license starts at $500. > > > > Is there an exiting class that performs these functions? > > Should it be included in BinaryCloud? > > > > Erm... http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.image.php ? > Or do you want something different? > > Konstantin. > > -- > * * Konstantin Chuguev Francis House > * * Application Engineer 112 Hills Road > * Tel: +44 1223 302992 Cambridge CB2 1PQ > D A N T E WWW: http://www.dante.net United Kingdom > > > > > _______________________________________________ > binarycloud-dev mailing list > bin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev |
From: Jason H. <jc...@ey...> - 2001-09-27 15:55:39
|
Alex, I'm looking at a re-write for the Makefile system. I'd like to have something like this... binarycloud/Makefile.in -> things that all makefiles will need binarycloud/Makefile -> make base, make ext, make user binarycloud/user/Makefile -> makes all site sub-directories / creates new ones binarycloud/user/site_name/Makefile -> makes site_name for every language defined in site_name/conf/Languages.php.xml This change is most warranted due to the multiple conf/Languages.php.xml we now have. This will also allow you to run 'make' from anywhere in your tree and it will know exactly what to make with what language(s). (with no environment variable prerequisites other than $BCHOME) jason |
From: Konstantin C. <Kon...@da...> - 2001-09-27 08:55:45
|
Charlie Killian wrote: > I might be creating a JPEG generator in php and was wonder if it would be of > use to BinaryCloud. The generator would take text and overlay it onto an > existing jpeg or create a new one. This would allow for pretty printing of > data. You can use a high quality logo and different fonts. You can do this > with the PDF library, of course, but the commercial license starts at $500. > > Is there an exiting class that performs these functions? > Should it be included in BinaryCloud? > Erm... http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.image.php ? Or do you want something different? Konstantin. -- * * Konstantin Chuguev Francis House * * Application Engineer 112 Hills Road * Tel: +44 1223 302992 Cambridge CB2 1PQ D A N T E WWW: http://www.dante.net United Kingdom |
From: Gerry K. <ge...@mc...> - 2001-09-27 03:47:28
|
> We will be able to generate metabase schema definitions from entity > definitions, but I don't (can't) force a 1:1 correspondence with entity > field names and table column names. > > The short answer is that if you build something relatively simple with > binarycloud you will almost certainly have a 1:1 field correspondence, > but if you're building something more complex you'll need more entities > to provide you with 'views' of your data. > So _how_ does binarycloud figure out the mapping from entity to tables and fields? Sorry if I'm not getting something rather obvious. Gerry > _alex > > -- IT Specialist | "Do not repay anyone evil for evil. If your enemy MCC | is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him Bangladesh | a drink. Do not be overcome by evil, | but overcome evil with good." - Bible ----------------------------------------- This email was sent using SquirrelMail. "Webmail for nuts!" http://squirrelmail.org/ |
From: Alex B. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-27 03:42:57
|
uhhzakly. that logic looks good to me :) -a > Ok, I'm seeing it now. I'm answering my own questions the more I > research the system. :p > > I'm thinking of going about it like this: > > in binarycloud/Makefile > > * get a list of langs (already in place) > * get a list of sites (will do) > > foreach site { > foreach lang { > do stuff > } > } > > jason > > >> Why is there a user/htdocs/Makefile? > >> Can't everything that's done here be done in user/Makefile? > >> Since htdocs/ is the only directory under user/ with a make system, it >> seems out of place. > > _______________________________________________ > binarycloud-dev mailing list > bin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev > |
From: Alex B. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-27 03:17:52
|
because htdocs/ has some specific requirements, specifically bcp->php translation, (eventually) resources handling + merges, etc. it isn't out of place, then again it isn't feature complete, either. that may be the source of your $.02 :) _a > > Why is there a user/htdocs/Makefile? > > Can't everything that's done here be done in user/Makefile? > > Since htdocs/ is the only directory under user/ with a make system, it > seems out of place. > > $.2 > jason > > _______________________________________________ > binarycloud-dev mailing list > bin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev > |
From: jason <ja...@gr...> - 2001-09-27 03:13:30
|
Ok, I'm seeing it now. I'm answering my own questions the more I research the system. :p I'm thinking of going about it like this: in binarycloud/Makefile * get a list of langs (already in place) * get a list of sites (will do) foreach site { foreach lang { do stuff } } jason >Why is there a user/htdocs/Makefile? >Can't everything that's done here be done in user/Makefile? >Since htdocs/ is the only directory under user/ with a make system, it >seems out of place. |
From: jason <ja...@gr...> - 2001-09-27 01:36:43
|
Why is there a user/htdocs/Makefile? Can't everything that's done here be done in user/Makefile? Since htdocs/ is the only directory under user/ with a make system, it seems out of place. $.2 jason |
From: Alex B. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-26 23:34:31
|
That's one of the things a ./configure would be great for... making sure all the various foo that needs to be set up is properly set up in the env, etc. Glad you found it. _a > This was from a missing $BCLANG which is declared in the > binarycloud/Makefile. Running make from binarycloud/user/ will bust > unless BCLANG is set in the environment. > > > > Alex Black wrote: >> I'm not seeing a busted makes process... >> >> can you send me the message? >> >> I'll make sure the sync is complete, but I haven't made any mods since I did >> the restructuring :) >> >> _a >> >>> If you run make in user/ currently, it busts out due to missing required >>> things such as language, etc. >>> >>> Should make only be run from binarycloud/, or do changes need to be made >>> to allow makes from various subdirs? > > _______________________________________________ > binarycloud-dev mailing list > bin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev > |
From: jason <ja...@gr...> - 2001-09-26 23:25:22
|
This was from a missing $BCLANG which is declared in the binarycloud/Makefile. Running make from binarycloud/user/ will bust unless BCLANG is set in the environment. Alex Black wrote: > I'm not seeing a busted makes process... > > can you send me the message? > > I'll make sure the sync is complete, but I haven't made any mods since I did > the restructuring :) > > _a > > > If you run make in user/ currently, it busts out due to missing required > > things such as language, etc. > > > > Should make only be run from binarycloud/, or do changes need to be made > > to allow makes from various subdirs? |
From: Alex B. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-26 22:32:30
|
I think there's something that might have a bit of what you're talking about, called vagrant. There's a copy of vagrant in ext./ I think. Anyway, VAGRANT is a graphing class, but it uses IMLIB to do the image operations, and I would be _amazed_ if you couldn't use it to lean th eimlib functions so you could do text overlays, etc. I don't know of anything specific, though obviously a quick run through sourceforge would be good. if you end up having to build the code, I'd love to have it as part of BC. There's all kinds of cool things you could do with that as part of a CMS (photo management app, etc etc etc) > I might be creating a JPEG generator in php and was wonder if it would be of > use to BinaryCloud. The generator would take text and overlay it onto an > existing jpeg or create a new one. This would allow for pretty printing of > data. You can use a high quality logo and different fonts. You can do this > with the PDF library, of course, but the commercial license starts at $500. > > Is there an exiting class that performs these functions? > Should it be included in BinaryCloud? _a |
From: Alex B. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-26 22:30:14
|
hi Jason, I'm not seeing a busted makes process... can you send me the message? I'll make sure the sync is complete, but I haven't made any mods since I did the restructuring :) _a > If you run make in user/ currently, it busts out due to missing required > things such as language, etc. > > Should make only be run from binarycloud/, or do changes need to be made > to allow makes from various subdirs? > > jason > > _______________________________________________ > binarycloud-dev mailing list > bin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev > |
From: Charlie K. <Ch...@Ti...> - 2001-09-26 21:10:51
|
I might be creating a JPEG generator in php and was wonder if it would be of use to BinaryCloud. The generator would take text and overlay it onto an existing jpeg or create a new one. This would allow for pretty printing of data. You can use a high quality logo and different fonts. You can do this with the PDF library, of course, but the commercial license starts at $500. Is there an exiting class that performs these functions? Should it be included in BinaryCloud? Charlie |
From: Jason H. <jc...@ey...> - 2001-09-26 19:58:30
|
If you run make in user/ currently, it busts out due to missing required things such as language, etc. Should make only be run from binarycloud/, or do changes need to be made to allow makes from various subdirs? jason |
From: Alex B. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-26 18:18:00
|
and ignore my message about it :) _a > Ugh.. I just did a 'make clean', and ran another make to find that this > directory now is not there. > > Oh well, ignore this I guess. > > > >> After doing a make, I noticed > >> binarycloud/build/htdocs > >> Why is this directory here? > > _______________________________________________ > binarycloud-dev mailing list > bin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev > |
From: Alex B. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-26 18:17:45
|
first, do a _clean_ checkout of the code from sourceforge. then, make sure there is a binarycloud/build directory and it's empty then to a make. when I make with the current codeset, I don't get a build/htdocs/ dir. _a > > After doing a make, I noticed > > binarycloud/build/htdocs > > Why is this directory here? > > _______________________________________________ > binarycloud-dev mailing list > bin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev > |
From: Alex B. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-26 18:16:16
|
everything below is correct :) _a > > Alex, am I seeing this right? > > ... > > $ cd binarycloud/ > $ make > > This will make all valid site directories found in binarycloud/user > > OR > > $ cd binarcloud/user > $ make site_name > > This will make just the site_name site directory. If this site_name > directory does not exist, it gets created, and populated from the > user/default directory. > > > > jason > > _______________________________________________ > binarycloud-dev mailing list > bin...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/binarycloud-dev > |
From: Jason H. <jc...@ey...> - 2001-09-26 17:32:42
|
Ugh.. I just did a 'make clean', and ran another make to find that this directory now is not there. Oh well, ignore this I guess. >After doing a make, I noticed >binarycloud/build/htdocs >Why is this directory here? |
From: Jason H. <jc...@ey...> - 2001-09-26 17:30:29
|
After doing a make, I noticed binarycloud/build/htdocs Why is this directory here? |
From: Jason H. <jc...@ey...> - 2001-09-26 16:54:20
|
Alex, am I seeing this right? ... $ cd binarycloud/ $ make This will make all valid site directories found in binarycloud/user OR $ cd binarcloud/user $ make site_name This will make just the site_name site directory. If this site_name directory does not exist, it gets created, and populated from the user/default directory. jason |
From: jason <ja...@gr...> - 2001-09-26 00:35:44
|
Gotcha. Alex Black wrote: > > Question: These should not be in the user/ dir anyway now, correct? > > These are not in the user/default/ dir. > > If so, you should remove them from the CVS repository. > > Well, the make system doesn't do multi-site make yet, and I'm loth to break > the installation in CVS in thge expectation that multi-site make will work > at some time in the future. > > So, for the moment they should stay, until you check in your makefile > changes. |
From: Alex B. <en...@tu...> - 2001-09-25 23:59:58
|
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Alex Black wrote: > >>> Wouldn't this be better accomplished with a user-definable field-type with >>> an >>> associated I/O class..having a tag called "encrypt" seems too simplistic to >>> really provide any meaningful encryption service.. >> >> For example: we'll have systeic control over encryption settings, but I >> think it's safe to assume that a developer would want to use the same key >> length and settings for all the fields (as it would be a nightmare to >> maintain a key per field, etc) >> >> in the entity definition, encryption is as simple as "encrypt" ... elsewhere >> we'll have very fine control over what exactly happens as a result. >> > > Cool, as long as using that tag doesn't mean you get shitty 56bit encryption > with a static salt :) em, no. hehe. yes, it's encryption for three-year-olds! :) _a |
From: John D. <jo...@we...> - 2001-09-25 23:42:29
|
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Alex Black wrote: > > Wouldn't this be better accomplished with a user-definable field-type with an > > associated I/O class..having a tag called "encrypt" seems too simplistic to > > really provide any meaningful encryption service.. > > For example: we'll have systeic control over encryption settings, but I > think it's safe to assume that a developer would want to use the same key > length and settings for all the fields (as it would be a nightmare to > maintain a key per field, etc) > > in the entity definition, encryption is as simple as "encrypt" ... elsewhere > we'll have very fine control over what exactly happens as a result. > Cool, as long as using that tag doesn't mean you get shitty 56bit encryption with a static salt :) -- John Donagher Application Engineer, Intacct Corp. Public key available off http://www.keyserver.net Key fingerprint = 4024 DF50 56EE 19A3 258A D628 22DE AD56 EEBE 8DDD |