[Bigdata-developers] splicing named solution sets

[Jeremy J C. <jj...@sy...>]

.I read 
https://wiki.blazegraph.com/wiki/index.php/SPARQL_Update#INSERT_INTO_with_ORDER_BY <https://wiki.blazegraph.com/wiki/index.php/SPARQL_Update#INSERT_INTO_with_ORDER_BY>

and I am trying to follow. (I actually don’t care about the order, only the splicing)

However, I find that to finish (my variant of) the example I need to do something like the following (where %codes is the solution set I created)

select *
WHERE
{
    { select ?s {
       INCLUDE %codes
    } LIMIT 100 OFFSET 5000 }

    graph </graph/abox> {
             ?s sci:rxnormCd ?drug
    }
    graph </graph/vocabulary/nlm/rxnorm#>  {
             ?drug </vocabulary/nlm/rxnorm#asGeneric> ?generic
     }
    graph </graph/vocabulary/nlm/rxnorm_generic#> {
             ?generic skos:prefLabel ?genericTerm
   }
}

where I use a subselect to do the splicing. This then does not work, I think because of BLZG-856

Am I missing the intent of the example on the wiki? or does BLZG-856 actually block it being useful.

(I was attracted since almost all items in SPARQL are unordered, in particular intermediate solution sets, so paging through partial solutions is hard)

Jeremy