Re: [Bigdata-developers] BLZG-852 and MINUS, possible workaround

[Bryan T. <br...@sy...>]

Jeremy,

Have you tested this issue in the 2.0 Candidate Release?

Thanks,
Bryan

----
Bryan Thompson
Chief Scientist & Founder
SYSTAP, LLC
4501 Tower Road
Greensboro, NC 27410
br...@sy...
http://blazegraph.com
http://blog.blazegraph.com

Blazegraph™ <http://www.blazegraph.com/> is our ultra high-performance
graph database that supports both RDF/SPARQL and Tinkerpop/Blueprints
APIs.  Blazegraph is now available with GPU acceleration using our disruptive
technology to accelerate data-parallel graph analytics and graph query.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email and its contents and attachments are
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and are confidential or
proprietary to SYSTAP. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure,
dissemination or copying of this email or its contents or attachments is
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
the sender by reply email and permanently delete all copies of the email
and its contents and attachments.

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jeremy J Carroll <jj...@sy...> wrote:

>
> I added a comment to this ticket with a possible workaround.
>
> We have continued performance issues with FILTER NOT EXISTS and initial
> trials seem to be showing better performance with MINUS, but we are nervous
> about the correctness issues.
>
> The workaround ensures there is always at least one shared variable
> between every binding, which IIRC, avoids the problem case.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bigdata-developers mailing list
> Big...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bigdata-developers
>