Re: [Bigdata-developers] Proposal for inline URIs

[Bryan T. <br...@sy...>]

You can run any given test suite using "ant -DtestName=<classname> junit".
I would generally suggest the appropriate TestAll class near what you have
touched.

Your pain will be greatly reduced once we get #168 (mavenization) a little
further along. This is moving along pretty quickly right now and should be
in 1.5.2 a little later this month.

Bryan

----
Bryan Thompson
Chief Scientist & Founder
SYSTAP, LLC
4501 Tower Road
Greensboro, NC 27410
br...@sy...
http://blazegraph.com
http://blog.bigdata.com <http://bigdata.com>
http://mapgraph.io

Blazegraph™ <http://www.blazegraph.com/> is our ultra high-performance
graph database that supports both RDF/SPARQL and Tinkerpop/Blueprints
APIs.  MapGraph™ <http://www.systap.com/mapgraph> is our disruptive new
technology to use GPUs to accelerate data-parallel graph analytics.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email and its contents and attachments are
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and are confidential or
proprietary to SYSTAP. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure,
dissemination or copying of this email or its contents or attachments is
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
the sender by reply email and permanently delete all copies of the email
and its contents and attachments.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Nikolas Everett <ni...@gm...> wrote:

> The tests I ran pass.  I imagine you should squash the commits into one if
> possible.
>
> I'm not sure how to run all the tests with ant.  Its always my complaint
> with ant :) I have to look through the build.xml to find the command to run
> tests. I couldn't find it in this case.
>
> I'll give it a more thorough shakedown this afternoon - backporting it and
> getting some more use out of it.
>
> Nik
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Bryan Thompson <br...@sy...> wrote:
>
>> I've attempted the merge to master. It looks ok for me locally and I have
>> committed the changes.  Can you verify that it looks good for you?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bryan
>>
>> ----
>> Bryan Thompson
>> Chief Scientist & Founder
>> SYSTAP, LLC
>> 4501 Tower Road
>> Greensboro, NC 27410
>> br...@sy...
>> http://blazegraph.com
>> http://blog.bigdata.com <http://bigdata.com>
>> http://mapgraph.io
>>
>> Blazegraph™ <http://www.blazegraph.com/> is our ultra high-performance
>> graph database that supports both RDF/SPARQL and Tinkerpop/Blueprints
>> APIs.  MapGraph™ <http://www.systap.com/mapgraph> is our disruptive new
>> technology to use GPUs to accelerate data-parallel graph analytics.
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email and its contents and attachments are
>> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and are confidential or
>> proprietary to SYSTAP. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure,
>> dissemination or copying of this email or its contents or attachments is
>> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
>> the sender by reply email and permanently delete all copies of the email
>> and its contents and attachments.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Nikolas Everett <ni...@gm...>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sourceforge wasn't letting me update the merge request in any way I'm
>>> used to so I made another one:
>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/bigdata/git/merge-requests/2/
>>>
>>> I spent some time poking around documentation but didn't look too hard
>>> so I'm sure I'm doing it wrong. If you know the right way please let me
>>> know.
>>>
>>> The trouble was that when I tried to push a new commit to the branch for
>>> my merge request sourceforge rejected it. It looks like sourceforge had
>>> amended my commit bringing its branch out of whack with my local branch.
>>> That combined with sourceforge being slow and not seeing the way to comment
>>> on individual lines is getting me grumpy about sourceforge merge requests.
>>>
>>> Nik
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Nikolas Everett <ni...@gm...>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I didn't!  I suspect sourceforge isn't emailing me.  I'll have a look
>>>> at it this afternoon.
>>>>
>>>> Nik
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Bryan Thompson <br...@sy...>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Nik,
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you see the feedback on that merge request?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Bryan
>>>>>
>>>>> ----
>>>>> Bryan Thompson
>>>>> Chief Scientist & Founder
>>>>> SYSTAP, LLC
>>>>> 4501 Tower Road
>>>>> Greensboro, NC 27410
>>>>> br...@sy...
>>>>> http://blazegraph.com
>>>>> http://blog.bigdata.com <http://bigdata.com>
>>>>> http://mapgraph.io
>>>>>
>>>>> Blazegraph™ <http://www.blazegraph.com/> is our ultra
>>>>> high-performance graph database that supports both RDF/SPARQL and
>>>>> Tinkerpop/Blueprints APIs.  MapGraph™ <http://www.systap.com/mapgraph> is
>>>>> our disruptive new technology to use GPUs to accelerate data-parallel graph
>>>>> analytics.
>>>>>
>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This email and its contents and attachments
>>>>> are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and are confidential or
>>>>> proprietary to SYSTAP. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure,
>>>>> dissemination or copying of this email or its contents or attachments is
>>>>> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
>>>>> the sender by reply email and permanently delete all copies of the email
>>>>> and its contents and attachments.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Nikolas Everett <ni...@gm...>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I filed 1179 <http://trac.bigdata.com/ticket/1179#ticket> a couple
>>>>>> of days ago and got together a patch this morning then read
>>>>>> http://wiki.blazegraph.com/wiki/index.php/Contributors and saw that
>>>>>> I should email here about it.  So here goes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I want inline URIs to have the same power that inline values do.
>>>>>> Right now inline values can be modified on the way into and out of the
>>>>>> index. Inline URIs can only be modified on the way into the index. That
>>>>>> leaves you pretty limited in what you can represent with them. Its OK if
>>>>>> you can design the URI scheme around the limitation but we can't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've put my patch as a gist
>>>>>> <https://gist.github.com/nik9000/1dc5248f6035349ca2c1> and I've
>>>>>> created a "merge request"
>>>>>> <https://sourceforge.net/p/bigdata/git/merge-requests/1/> for it. It
>>>>>> gives the InlineURIHandler that built the inline URI a crack at building
>>>>>> the localName from the inlined value.  The cost is an extra HashMap lookup
>>>>>> whenever the uri is un-inlined and the default behavior is unchanged.  It
>>>>>> doesn't change the on disk representation either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nik
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
>>>>>> Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
>>>>>> Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live
>>>>>> exercises
>>>>>> http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual-
>>>>>> event?utm_
>>>>>> source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Bigdata-developers mailing list
>>>>>> Big...@li...
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bigdata-developers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>