Re: [Bigdata-developers] Order by and search

[Bryan T. <br...@sy...>]

I think that this is an issue that appeared between sparql 1.1 last call
working draft and the sparql 1.1 recommendation. Last moment change to the
spec.

Bryan
On Nov 5, 2014 5:46 PM, "Jeremy J Carroll" <jj...@sy...> wrote:

>
>
> On Nov 5, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Bryan Thompson <br...@sy...> wrote:
>
> There could be an issue with ORDER BY operating on an anonymous and
> non-projected variable.  Try declaring and binding a variable for
> STR(?label) inside of the query and then using that variable in the ORDER
> BY clause.
>
>
>
> Yes I tend to find the results of ORDER BY are more what I expect if I do
> not include an expression in the ORDER BY but simply variables. I BIND any
> expression before the ORDER BY.
>
> I believe there is a trac item for this, but since the workaround is easy,
> I have never seen it as high priority
>
> Jeremy
>
>