From: Jeremy J C. <jj...@sy...> - 2014-05-05 12:26:12
|
The changes had nothing to do with the graph issue I don't think (not verified); 874 is not fixed (disappointingly - verified only at the optimized AST level), 759 is (surprisingly - and closed as worksforme) Jeremy On May 5, 2014, at 5:05 AM, Bryan Thompson <br...@sy...> wrote: > Jeremy, > > Can you look over the tickets at trac.bigdata.com and see which ones can > be closed? In particular, I am curious whether any of the other FILTER > tickets are related to and/or fixed by your recent changes or if you are > actively working on any of these issues and expect resolution before the > 1.3.1 release. > > http://trac.bigdata.com/ticket/888 (GRAPH ignored by FILTER NOT EXISTS) > http://trac.bigdata.com/ticket/874 (FILTER not applied when there is UNION > in the same join group) > http://trac.bigdata.com/ticket/792 (GRAPH ?g { FILTER NOT EXISTS { ?s ?p > ?o } } not respecting ?g) > http://trac.bigdata.com/ticket/759 (multiple filters interfere) > > > Thanks, > Bryan > > On 5/4/14 9:12 PM, "Jeremy J Carroll" <jj...@sy...> wrote: > >> A quick inspection revealed a new file that I forgot to add Š >> I will check in a couple of hours to see that that fixed things >> >> Jeremy >> >> >> >> On May 4, 2014, at 6:09 PM, Jeremy J Carroll <jj...@sy...> wrote: >> >>> >>> Looks like my last commit broke something Š checking now >>> >>> Jeremy J Carroll >>> Principal Architect >>> Syapse, Inc. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >> Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find >> out: >> • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity >> • Requirements for releasing software faster >> • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce >> _______________________________________________ >> Bigdata-developers mailing list >> Big...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bigdata-developers > |