|
From: Peter A. <ans...@gm...> - 2013-08-06 23:01:02
|
On 7 August 2013 00:48, Bryan Thompson <br...@sy...> wrote: > FYI, I have created a ticket to act as a placeholder for the openrdf 2.7 > migration. This migration is not yet scheduled. > Bryan > > On 8/6/13 10:43 AM, "bigdata®" <no...@so...> wrote: > > >#714: Migrate to openrdf 2.7 > >--------------------------+----------------------------------------------- > >-- > > Reporter: thompsonbry | Owner: mrpersonick > > Type: enhancement | Status: new > > Priority: major | Milestone: Project management > >Component: Bigdata SAIL | Version: BIGDATA_RELEASE_1_2_3 > > Keywords: | > >--------------------------+----------------------------------------------- > >-- > > This is a feature request to migrate to openrdf 2.7. This request has > >been > > discussed on the bigdata-developers email list. There have also been some > > questions about the timing of this migration on the forum. The migration > > has not yet been scheduled. > > > > 2.7 introduces some changes in tx support/scope that we need to look at. > > If someone wants to attempt the 2.7 migration I can point at what needs > >to > > be done. The main issues are any api semantics changes (and 2.7 may have > > some, capturing the delta in any classes where we maintain a fork > > (including the test suites), picking up any new test suites for > > compliance, and capturing any missing functionality as openrdf continues > > to capture the final sparql 1.1 recommendation. > > > > One of the other reasons to go to 2.7 is if it supports SPARQL VALUES > > (rather than BINDINGS). However, I do not yet have confirmation that it > > does. > > > I am using SPARQL VALUES in a 2.7 application, so it is there from 2.7.0 [1]. As far as I know there is only one remaining failing test for SPARQL-1.1 to get to full compliance with the query and update specs [2] A list of changes for developers is on the documentation site at [3] Cheers, Peter [1] https://openrdf.atlassian.net/browse/SES-1020 [2] https://openrdf.atlassian.net/browse/SES-937 [3] http://openrdf.callimachus.net/sesame/2.7/docs/articles/upgrade-notes.docbook?view |