RE: Fwd: Re: [Big-devel] big bad mother schema (was RE: RE: appinfo stuff)

[Ben R. <na...@us...>]

On 31/10/02 at 10:54 PM, Jim Croft <jr...@an...> wrote:

> 
> >We just need to work out which bits of the meta schema we
> >attempt to place within the main schema <xs:element> sections as
> ><xs:annotation>.
> 
> basically everything that does not fit in the main part of the
> element itself...


Sorry, but I don't follow your meaning..


> >BTW, I like what I see in Greg's example of using Dublin Core
> >and RDF..
> 
> I think we need to be clear about what we are going here.  From
> my understanding of the story, Dubin Core is designed to describe
> the basics of a resource, in the AVH/HISPID scheme of things, a
> file.  Thus I think it belongs in the file head stuff, describing
> the hispid file as a whole...
> 
> At this stage I am not convinced that it is applicable for each
> element, but I am willing to try and be convinced... :)
> 
> I guess the question Greg is asking is, should we explicitly
> invoke the dc: namespace for these metadata elements, or just use
> our own version of compatible elements that can be translated to
> dc: when and if needed?  any views?

Well, I should have been more specific.  I was glad to see a working
example of using namespaces.  All my attempts failed validation in
XMLSpy, but this one passed validation.

Cheers,
Ben