RE: Fwd: Re: [Big-devel] big bad mother schema (was RE: RE: appinfo stuff)

[Ben R. <be...@ca...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: big...@li...
> [mailto:big...@li...]On Behalf Of Jim Croft
> Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2002 8:41 PM
> To: Jerry Cooper
> Cc: big...@li...
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [Big-devel] big bad mother schema (was RE: RE:
> appinfo stuff)
>
> > I don't think writing the XSLT to produce documentation in
> > HTML/PDF etc will be that hard. If somebody wants to combine
> > the obvious matches
> > between the current meta-schema and the schema, into some
> > structured form within annotation, then I volunteer to 'start'
> > the XSLT.
>
> well done...
>
> the first thing we need to do is agree on the draft HISPID
> meta schema
> thing I threw together...  anyone want to change/enhance it
> before Jerry
> starts hacking code?

I've been checking in minor enhancements to the documentation (meta)
schema as I try to make use of it to document the schema.

The files are as follows within the CVS big/hispid/hispid5 area:

* hispid5_schema.xsd  -  The meta schema itself.

* hispid5doc.xml - an instance document of the above schema.

* hispid5doc.xsl - an XSLT document that attempts to use the above
instance document to output HTML.

Fairly obviously, these need to be kept in sync with the main schema.

We just need to work out which bits of the meta schema we attempt to
place within the main schema <xs:element> sections as <xs:annotation>..

BTW, I like what I see in Greg's example of using Dublin Core and RDF..

Cheers,
Ben