What is the idea of empty directory biblioteq.d?
Why not to install config into it's standard place, for example /etc/biblioteq/biblioteq.conf?
Why not to install binary into standard path (/usr/bin/BiblioteQ, in such case script is not needed at all)?
For my experience qt_*.qm localization files also looks strange.
Adding into installation rules desktop file I've got one more error message:
>>> Completed installing biblioteq-9999 into /var/tmp/portage/app-text/biblioteq-9999/image/
* QA Notice: This package installs one or more .desktop files that do not
* pass validation.
*
* /usr/share/applications/biblioteq.desktop: error: (will be fatal in the future): value "text/html;/text/xml;application/xhtml_xml;" for key "MimeType" in group "Desktop Entry" contains value "/text/xml" which is an invalid MIME type: "/text/xml" contains an invalid character in the subtype
desktop file also ignores standard paths, containing hardcoded non-standard.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
The BiblioteQ.d.tar.gz file from SourceForge is essentially a copy of the the GitHub repository.
What are you attempting to install? Where did you download the file from? On Unix systems, I don't provide an installation package. On OS X, the provided bundle is not an installation file. On W32, I provide a simple ZIP file with all of the relevant ingredients.
So, I'm not responsible for the "portage" package.
I don't know who created the package that you're using.
On my machine, I have BQ installed in /usr/local/biblioteq.
ls /usr/local/biblioteq/
BiblioteQ biblioteq.conf biblioteq.sh book.png
BQ doesn't need an installation. It may be launched from anywhere. If it's unable to locate biblioteq.conf, it will inform you.
Please don't report third-party problems here. You should contact the vendor.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
For now I try to build test Qt4 version using biblioteq.pro rules set.
It is not «"portage" package», it is installation accordingly with biblioteq.pro.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Trying to install BiblioteQ I've find very strange package list:
What is the idea of empty directory biblioteq.d?
Why not to install config into it's standard place, for example /etc/biblioteq/biblioteq.conf?
Why not to install binary into standard path (/usr/bin/BiblioteQ, in such case script is not needed at all)?
For my experience qt_*.qm localization files also looks strange.
Adding into installation rules desktop file I've got one more error message:
desktop file also ignores standard paths, containing hardcoded non-standard.
The official source of BQ is https://github.com/textbrowser/biblioteq.
The BiblioteQ.d.tar.gz file from SourceForge is essentially a copy of the the GitHub repository.
What are you attempting to install? Where did you download the file from? On Unix systems, I don't provide an installation package. On OS X, the provided bundle is not an installation file. On W32, I provide a simple ZIP file with all of the relevant ingredients.
So, I'm not responsible for the "portage" package.
I don't know who created the package that you're using.
On my machine, I have BQ installed in /usr/local/biblioteq.
ls /usr/local/biblioteq/
BiblioteQ biblioteq.conf biblioteq.sh book.png
BQ doesn't need an installation. It may be launched from anywhere. If it's unable to locate biblioteq.conf, it will inform you.
Please don't report third-party problems here. You should contact the vendor.
For now I try to build test Qt4 version using biblioteq.pro rules set.
It is not «"portage" package», it is installation accordingly with biblioteq.pro.
qmake -o Makefile biblioteq.pro
make