#23 A few suggestions

[Anonymous]

In authortitle-dw.bbx there are three occurences of \enquote, I'd suggest to use \mkbibquote instead which is the 'official' wrapper for quotation marks per the biblatex documentation.

Furthermore, the style defines \bbx@iffieldinteger, which I think could probably be substitued by the built-in \iffieldint test.

I also saw a few uses of \mkbibparens/\mkbibbrackets in footnote-dw.cbx where I would have used \printtext[parens]/\printtext[brackets]. As far as I can see, the two brances in cite:seenote differ only by that one wrapper, so one might be able to get away only one branch by putting the logic for that into a \DeclareFieldFormat like this (untested!)

\newbibmacro*{cite:seenote}{%
  \ifbool{cbx:review}
    {}
    {\addspace\printtext[cite:seenote]{%
     \midsentence\bibstring{seenote}\addnbspace%
     \ref{cbx@\csuse{cbx@first@\thefield{entrykey}}}%
     \ifbool{cbx:pageref}
       {\ifsamepage{\the\value{instcount}}
                   {\csuse{cbx@first@\thefield{entrykey}}}
         {}
         {\addcomma\space\bibstring{page}\addnbspace%
          \pageref{cbx@\csuse{cbx@first@\thefield{entrykey}}}}}
       {}}}}

\DeclareFieldFormat{cite:seenote}{\ifbool{cbx:parencitefoot}{\mkbibbrackets{#1}}{\mkbibparens{#1}}}

I would probably move most of the bare \add... punctuation commands inside a \setunit, but that might just be out of habit.