Re: [Beepcore-java-users] [PATCH] for logging

[Harrie H. <ha...@in...>]

Hi David,

There is also a 'java.util.logging.Level' and 'java.util.logging.Logger'
class in the since 1.4. So it would maybe better to use those.

Harrie

Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
> David Blacka wrote:
> 
>> Harrie Hazewinkel wrote:
>>
>>> HI,
>>>
>>> While checking out the functionality of beepcore-java
>>> I run into a problem of the API with log4j. Attached is a
>>> patch that fixes the code for a recent 1.3 version of log4j.
>>> Hope it will be applied.
>>
>>
>>
>> What was the actual problem?
>>
>> I will note that the commons-logging package will absolutely use log4j 
>> if  log4j is present in the classpath.  You should be able to 
>> configure log4j first, and control the behavior of the commons-logging 
>> package. At that point, it is just a basic wrapper around log4j.
>>
> 
> While compiling the code I got a lot of errors, like package not found
> (due to classpatch indeed), but also some method API problems.
> While investigating I saw you seemed to have a different API
> for it (the common-logging), so I changed it directly into a recent
> version of the log4j.
> 
> I did not follow log4j that close, but if I understand it well
> it as become a more 'stand-alone' package with the name log4j.
> The logging-common is still there, but would you really keep that
> layer in between? You may decide that.
> 
> 
> cheers,
> Harrie
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
> Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
> who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. 
> Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
> _______________________________________________
> Beepcore-java-users mailing list
> Bee...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/beepcore-java-users