Re: [Beepcore-java-users] Speed

[Paul H. <Pau...@ya...>]

Iain, Folks,

Many have asked for how to repeat our tests.  Here goes...  See the 
README at http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/altrmi/ 
for general info on the other benchmarks. The ant targets that do the 
business are "socketa-serve" & "socketa-client".

The addition (two dos shells) instrctions to invoke BEEP are :

  In DOS shell #1 - "ant -buildfile tests2.xml beep-serve"
  In DOS shell #2 - "ant -buildfile tests2.xml beep-client"

(note the different build file).

It is more complex that you folks might hope for, but it is not really 
about testing beep, more of using it in a mature project.  AltRMI has no 
downloadable listing, it is best got from CVS (not hard for persons 
assembed here?). See instructions : 
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/cvsindex.html

- Paul

>>I have run a test of BEEP usage.  Basically the speed is about 10% of
>>that of the same test without BEEP as a layer. I was wondering if that
>>was expected.
>>
>>The test is a client and server in different VMs, with BEEP handling
>>streaming over sockets.  The test uses no multiplexing features.
>>
>
>Hi,
>
>I'm new to BEEP but thouht I'd throw in my 2 cents...
>
>Could you post the test somewhere?  I'd be interested in seeing how it was
>conducted.  There is some BEEP overhead but depending on the message sizes
>and what not I would think it varies significantly.  It should be a priority
>to categorize the performance of BEEP (is that done or being done already?).
>
>-iain
>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Beepcore-java-users mailing list
>Bee...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/beepcore-java-users
>