Iain, Folks,
Many have asked for how to repeat our tests. Here goes... See the
README at http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/altrmi/
for general info on the other benchmarks. The ant targets that do the
business are "socketa-serve" & "socketa-client".
The addition (two dos shells) instrctions to invoke BEEP are :
In DOS shell #1 - "ant -buildfile tests2.xml beep-serve"
In DOS shell #2 - "ant -buildfile tests2.xml beep-client"
(note the different build file).
It is more complex that you folks might hope for, but it is not really
about testing beep, more of using it in a mature project. AltRMI has no
downloadable listing, it is best got from CVS (not hard for persons
assembed here?). See instructions :
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/cvsindex.html
- Paul
>>I have run a test of BEEP usage. Basically the speed is about 10% of
>>that of the same test without BEEP as a layer. I was wondering if that
>>was expected.
>>
>>The test is a client and server in different VMs, with BEEP handling
>>streaming over sockets. The test uses no multiplexing features.
>>
>
>Hi,
>
>I'm new to BEEP but thouht I'd throw in my 2 cents...
>
>Could you post the test somewhere? I'd be interested in seeing how it was
>conducted. There is some BEEP overhead but depending on the message sizes
>and what not I would think it varies significantly. It should be a priority
>to categorize the performance of BEEP (is that done or being done already?).
>
>-iain
>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Beepcore-java-users mailing list
>Bee...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/beepcore-java-users
>
|
