From: William J. M. <wm...@ol...> - 2002-01-21 02:30:48
|
I appear to be hitting a condition where I stall in sendMSG when I have put more than 4K on the output datastream to send. Looking at the conversation as it goes by, the RPY starts being sent, and I get the first 3 frames, the recieving end is sending SEQ frames and opening the window properly, but the sendMSG function aparently stalls after sending 4K of data. Should'nt the SEQ's be getting processed? Is this a known problem? -bill |
From: Huston <hu...@us...> - 2002-01-21 13:29:07
|
Bill, If you are sending the message and then adding data to the DataStream then yes, I haven't added the call to continue sending as more data is added to the DataStream. That is next on my list of tasks. If this is not what you are doing, I haven't seen the problem so please send some sample code to reproduce the problem and I will look into it. --Huston > I appear to be hitting a condition where I stall in sendMSG when > I have put more than 4K on the output datastream to send. > Looking at the conversation as it goes by, the RPY starts > being sent, and I get the first 3 frames, the recieving end > is sending SEQ frames and opening the window properly, but > the sendMSG function aparently stalls after sending 4K of > data. Should'nt the SEQ's be getting processed? > > Is this a known problem? |
From: William J. M. <wm...@ol...> - 2002-01-22 01:14:09
|
Well, we were just stuffing a really large (10K+) thing in a single sendMSG and seeing it stall. No additional adds. -bill On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 06:26:51AM -0700, Huston wrote: > Bill, > > If you are sending the message and then adding data to the DataStream then > yes, I haven't added the call to continue sending as more data is added to > the DataStream. That is next on my list of tasks. > > If this is not what you are doing, I haven't seen the problem so please send > some sample code to reproduce the problem and I will look into it. > > --Huston > > > I appear to be hitting a condition where I stall in sendMSG when > > I have put more than 4K on the output datastream to send. > > Looking at the conversation as it goes by, the RPY starts > > being sent, and I get the first 3 frames, the recieving end > > is sending SEQ frames and opening the window properly, but > > the sendMSG function aparently stalls after sending 4K of > > data. Should'nt the SEQ's be getting processed? > > > > Is this a known problem? > |
From: William J. M. <wm...@ol...> - 2002-01-22 01:51:36
|
Huston, I f you run Bing with a -size of 1500 you get normal operation? This is what I am using for testing on right now on the bug I am trying to find. Different one form the stallign bug on send. Looks like the second frame comes in and the getNextReply is hanging up in the wait, not sure why, bit h frames appear to have been recieved with recieveRPY ... this is the big one at the moment. Do not know whether the fact that we are using java 1.4 is significant. java version "1.4.0-beta3" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0-beta3-b84) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0-beta3-b84, mixed mode) On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 06:26:51AM -0700, Huston wrote: > Bill, > > If you are sending the message and then adding data to the DataStream then > yes, I haven't added the call to continue sending as more data is added to > the DataStream. That is next on my list of tasks. > > If this is not what you are doing, I haven't seen the problem so please send > some sample code to reproduce the problem and I will look into it. > > --Huston > > > I appear to be hitting a condition where I stall in sendMSG when > > I have put more than 4K on the output datastream to send. > > Looking at the conversation as it goes by, the RPY starts > > being sent, and I get the first 3 frames, the recieving end > > is sending SEQ frames and opening the window properly, but > > the sendMSG function aparently stalls after sending 4K of > > data. Should'nt the SEQ's be getting processed? > > > > Is this a known problem? > |
From: Huston <hu...@us...> - 2002-01-22 03:53:07
|
Bill, > I f you run Bing with a -size of 1500 you get normal operation? Yes, I have tried sizes from 10 bytes to 1,000,000 bytes (including 1500 bytes)with no problems. Check to make sure to are working with the head of the cvs tree because I did check in a fix the middle of last week. > Looks like the second frame comes in and the getNextReply is > hanging up in the wait, not sure why, bit h frames appear to > have been recieved with recieveRPY ... this is the big one at the > moment. This sounds like you are not using the API correctly. Could you send me an example of your code that I could try? > Do not know whether the fact that we are using java 1.4 is > significant. I use both 1.4 and 1.2.2 in my testing so that should be causing a problem. --Huston |