[Beankeeper-discussion] Are persistent user transactions possible with BeanKeeper?
Brought to you by:
demonsystem
From: Daniel F. <da...@di...> - 2009-09-09 14:34:12
|
Hi, having reviewed quite a number of Java persistence solutions I think BeanKeeper is by far the easiest and cleanest (but yet very powerful) solution. I was especially taken with the full versioning concept which would be really helpful in my application. But after reading the tutorial and the docs I'm still not sure: Are persistent user transactions possible with BeanKeeper? I would like to make even non-completed transactions to survive an application restart, s.t. users can resume working with this transactions (after e.g. a server restart). This would require to make the non-completed transactions somehow persistent - but without sacrificing the transaction isolation of course (if user X has such a non-completed transaction open no other user should see the changes done inside it). Yours, Daniel |