sctl-0.2.3 dot config file denotes "unknown" for bc245xlt.
I'm guessing sctl cannot distinguish the bc245xlt scanner automatically.
As such, users need to edit the sctl dot config file manually.
Logged In: YES user_id=348797
I see it's hardcoded in config.h
If the proper model # is present in config.h, sctl will not write a config file.
If the proper is not in config.h, sctl will write a dot config file with the model "unknown" written.
Might it be best to write a dot config file by default whether or not it is defined within config.h?
If for some reason, the author prefers keeping sctl from ever writing a dot config file, might recommend: #define DEFAULT_MODEL BC895XLT
be made to:
#define DEFAULT_MODEL UNKNOWN
Just a thought here. This way, even the users having a BC895XLT will then have a sctl dot config file to work with instead of having to create one.
Log in to post a comment.
Logged In: YES
user_id=348797
I see it's hardcoded in config.h
If the proper model # is present in config.h, sctl will not
write a config file.
If the proper is not in config.h, sctl will write a dot
config file with the model "unknown" written.
Might it be best to write a dot config file by default
whether or not it is defined within config.h?
If for some reason, the author prefers keeping sctl from
ever writing a dot config file, might recommend:
#define DEFAULT_MODEL BC895XLT
be made to:
#define DEFAULT_MODEL UNKNOWN
Just a thought here. This way, even the users having a
BC895XLT will then have a sctl dot config file to work with
instead of having to create one.