Re: [Bastille-linux-discuss] Changes in the CVS

[<jfe...@ge...>]

BUCK,KEITH (HP-FtCollins,ex1) wrote:

>>In any case I have submitted a new version of the bastille package to 
>>Debian, based on the 2.0.4 (latest) release. And including back again 
>>the psad support in Questions.txt since 'psad' is now provided as a 
>>separate package (it makes it easier for users to upgrade 
>>independently of bastille, which can be used for configuration)
>>
>>    
>>
>How is 2.1.0 (top-of-trunk) looking?  That's the one that 
> - changes are being made to in CVS
> - is supposed to officially support Debian
>
>	-Keith
>
Well, as a matter of fact 2.1.0 is _not_ officially supported in Debian 
:) Debian provides packages both for 1.3 (in the stable Debian release) 
and for 2.0.4 (in the unstable release).
I have not yet thoroughly tested 2.1.0 in a Debian system (just a slight 
test to see if it will make the changes on the configuration files 
properly) but I believe there are no changes that would make it break 
(correct me if I'm wrong). I'm still struggling to get my development 
environment to work at home and thus work more on the latests source 
code base (once I have multiple virtual servers where to test and break :)

Regards

Javi