Re: [B2-devel] 64-bit BasiliskII MacOSX ?

[Frank T. <fra...@gm...>]

Oh. I missed that. I have not needed to build Basilisk II in a while.

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Robert Munafo <mr...@gm...> wrote:

> No, Frank, not SheepShaver. BasiliskII. Read the original question again.
>
> SheepShaver has a different JIT (it targets PowerPC rather than 68K)
> and thus manages to avoid the CMOV problem.
>
> On 7/3/12, Frank Trampe <fra...@gm...> wrote:
> > cambridge:~ admin$ file /Applications/SheepShaver-2.3/Support/SheepShaver
> > /Applications/SheepShaver-2.3/Support/SheepShaver: Mach-O 64-bit
> executable
> > x86_64
> >
> > I was able to do this on Snow Leopard early this year, I believe. It may
> be
> > that you did not have 64-bit versions of the dependencies installed when
> > you tried to build in 64-bit mode. Do you use MacPorts?
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Ronald P. Regensburg
> > <ron...@xs...>wrote:
> >> I noticed the commit "Use clip_macosx64.mm for BasiliskII 64-bit builds
> >> too."
> >>
> >> However, I have never been able to build a working 64-bit BasiliskII
> >> MacOSX. And as far as I know, no one has.
> >>
> >> In Snow Leopard I can build a 32-bit BasiliskII fine. Attempts to build
> a
> >> 64-bit application result at best in a x86_64 application that crashes
> on
> >> launch.
> >>
> >> Can a 64-bit BasiliskII MacOSX be build from current source? If so, how?
>
> --
>   Robert Munafo  --  mrob.com
>   Follow me at: gplus.to/mrob - fb.com/mrob27 - twitter.com/mrob_27 -
> mrob27.wordpress.com - youtube.com/user/mrob143 - rilybot.blogspot.com
>