Re: [B2-devel] 64-bit BasiliskII MacOSX ?

[Robert M. <mr...@gm...>]

No, Frank, not SheepShaver. BasiliskII. Read the original question again.

SheepShaver has a different JIT (it targets PowerPC rather than 68K)
and thus manages to avoid the CMOV problem.

On 7/3/12, Frank Trampe <fra...@gm...> wrote:
> cambridge:~ admin$ file /Applications/SheepShaver-2.3/Support/SheepShaver
> /Applications/SheepShaver-2.3/Support/SheepShaver: Mach-O 64-bit executable
> x86_64
>
> I was able to do this on Snow Leopard early this year, I believe. It may be
> that you did not have 64-bit versions of the dependencies installed when
> you tried to build in 64-bit mode. Do you use MacPorts?
>
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Ronald P. Regensburg
> <ron...@xs...>wrote:
>> I noticed the commit "Use clip_macosx64.mm for BasiliskII 64-bit builds
>> too."
>>
>> However, I have never been able to build a working 64-bit BasiliskII
>> MacOSX. And as far as I know, no one has.
>>
>> In Snow Leopard I can build a 32-bit BasiliskII fine. Attempts to build a
>> 64-bit application result at best in a x86_64 application that crashes on
>> launch.
>>
>> Can a 64-bit BasiliskII MacOSX be build from current source? If so, how?

-- 
  Robert Munafo  --  mrob.com
  Follow me at: gplus.to/mrob - fb.com/mrob27 - twitter.com/mrob_27 -
mrob27.wordpress.com - youtube.com/user/mrob143 - rilybot.blogspot.com