From: Frank T. <fra...@gm...> - 2012-06-16 16:35:33
|
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Charles Srstka < bas...@ch...> wrote: > On Jun 16, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Alexander von Gluck wrote: > > I'd vote to do as you said for sheepshaver and keep B2 as-is. Maybe someday > SS could do what B2 does and then you could drop B2 completely :) > > > I disagree with this one. Basilisk II is quite useful for running late 68k > Mac stuff, and it would be a shame for it not to pick up any improvements > that get made to the shared code. > > And Basilisk II seems to be a bit more flexible about the memory model . > Charles > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > basilisk-devel mailing list > bas...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/basilisk-devel > > |