From: Gwenole B. <gb...@di...> - 2004-12-16 20:46:19
|
Hi, > Seems like the current CVS is quite x86-centric, or maybe those are=20 > just problems > with gcc 3.4 : Hmm, people did reported build problems for both Basilisk II &=20 SheepShaver on FC3/x86_64 but this should really be fixed in current=20 CVS (cvs update -d to be sure). I have just built a binary of B2 with=20 gcc 3.4.1 on x86_64 and new binutils 2.15.92.0.2 which is what I=20 assume FC3 is using to report those suffix errors with push/pop. FWIW, my system is Mandrakelinux 10.1 for x86-64. ;-) Bye, Gwenol=E9.= |