RE: [B2-devel] [ANN] Basilisk II JIT snapshot 2004/11/09

[Tomek J. <to...@je...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bas...@li...=20
> [mailto:bas...@li...] On Behalf=20
> Of Gwenole Beauchesne
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 8:38 AM
> To: bas...@li...
> Subject: Re: [B2-devel] [ANN] Basilisk II JIT snapshot 2004/11/09
>=20
> mercredi 10 novembre 2004, =E0 07:48  am, Bob Deblier a =E9crit :
>=20
> >  Seems this header on its own doesn't know type 'struct sockaddr',=20
> > hence it should include <sys/socket.h> in its test
>=20
> Thanks, fixed in CVS.
>=20
> > Trying to compile after ./configure --with-jit-compiler results in a
> > problem:
>=20
> Could you copy this line (without -o obj/compemu_support.o=20
> and s/-c/-S) so that you cuold actually read the=20
> compemu_support.s generated file?
>=20
> Then, if this is inline assembly code, it may be surrounded=20
> by something like "#NO_APP". Otherwise, it's compiler generated code.
>=20
> > g++ -I../include -I. -I../uae_cpu -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -DOS_linux -
> > DDIRECT_ADDRESSING -DUNALIGNED_PROFITABLE -DX86_64_ASSEMBLY -=20
> > DOPTIMIZED_FLAGS -DUSE_JIT -DUSE_JIT_FPU -DFPU_IEEE -D_REENTRANT -=20
> > DDATADIR=3D\"/usr/local/share/BasiliskII\" -O2 -I/usr/X11R6/include =
-
> > I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 -I/usr/include/glib-1.2=20
> > -I/usr/lib64/glib/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -fno-merge-constants=20
> > -fno-gcse-sm - c ../uae_cpu/compiler/compemu_support.cpp -o=20
> > obj/compemu_support.o
>=20
> > /tmp/ccmQvYdd.s: Assembler messages:
> > /tmp/ccmQvYdd.s:40547: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
> > /tmp/ccmQvYdd.s:40547: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop'
> > make: *** [obj/compemu_support.o] Error 1
>=20
> I don't know where it is coming from either. I have no=20
> explicit reference to pushl or pushq as inline assembly.
>=20

When compiling Sheepshaver on x86_64 I'm experiencing similar errors
on FC3 test3 as well. There must be some wierdness here.
A bit of googling reveals that Sheepshaver is not the only one program
that suffers from this. It seems to happen only on x86_64 with the
newest GCC versions. I will investigate more later.

Jerzu

http://www.google.pl/search?q=3D%22Error:+suffix+or+operands+invalid+for+=
%60pu
sh%27%22&hl=3Dpl&lr=3D&start=3D0&sa=3DN